Ultrasound and MRI are the two main types of imaging used to aid prostate cancer diagnosis, and the use of multipara metric 3T MRI presents a major advancement in prostate cancer detection and diagnosis because of its superior imaging ability over ultrasound alone. Fusion is a process that blends these technologies to create a detailed, 360° prostate map by merging previously captured MRI images with live TRUS images while the ultrasound wand is inserted. Only a very small number of U.S. urologists have the necessary knowledge, equipment
The correct descriptive term for this type of imaging is “MRI Ultrasound Fusion Guided Biopsy.” However, other terms are frequently used and refer to the same process. These terms include Fusion-Guided Biopsy, Fusion Biopsy, MRI/US Biopsy, MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy, and simply MR Fusion Biopsy. Because these terms can be confusing, we prefer the technically correct name for this procedure.
How does it work?
An urologist must be specially trained to read prostate MRI and identify the area of interest (suspected tumor). The urologist must also “segment” or input the prostate outline into the computer to facilitate matching MRI and TRUS shapes. Special software is necessary that can recognize both types of images, assign “coordinates” to each type, and match (register) the images, coordinate by coordinate. This is called image registration or co-registration, and it overlays the live TRUS image onto the static MRI image. The result a synthetic 3D image of the patient’s gland that is quite accurate, but not perfect, due to small variables such as patient movement or inaccurate segmentation. The final 3D image can be manipulated on the computer screen so the urologist can view it from every angle, and the suspicious area is highlighted within the image.
To get the idea, imagine you insert several photos of your face from various angles into a computer that can scan and read them. Now imagine a friend taking a video all around your face, and the video image inputted into the same computer, which matches the live video with the still photos. The computer now blends all the images and creates a 3D view of you that looks like a Pixar image of yourself. Your friend can use the computer mouse to rotate the Pixar image of you from different angles. The resemblance may be quite remarkable, but there may be some slight differences or distortions.
Prostate MRI Ultrasound Fusion imaging is done in the urologist’s office to help identify the target area for the biopsy and guide needles into it.
Is it accurate?
Experts agree that targeted MRI Ultrasound Fusion Guided Biopsies are generally more accurate than traditional TRUS biopsies (ultrasound only) in detecting and diagnosing prostate cancer. Depending on the software or fusion device, the computer may help plan the sampling based on the target area(s) within the gland as depicted in the fused images. The urologist using fusion technology can follow the plan or override it. This includes the number of needles and angle of approach. The real-time TRUS verifies the placement of the needles, which show up on the monitor.
Comparison of MRI-guided Biopsy vs. Fusion-guided Biopsy
- MRI imaging done live and in real time
- MRI images are free from inaccuracy or distortion
- Radiologist able to see live target
- Radiologist already experienced in reading and inter-preting MRI images
- Eliminates additional time needed by fusion process for segmentation and image matching
- All done on same day
MRI Ultrasound Fusion-guided Biopsy
- TRUS imaging done live and in real time, but MRI is not. Previous MRI images are used.
- Fusion images may have some distortion due to factors such as patient movement or imprecise segmentation of the gland outline
- Urologist sees target based on images generated from previous MRI im-ages
- Urologist is not an expert in reading MRI images
- Additional time required for the image segmentation and matching process
- May take two visits
Conventional Detection Methods
Prostate ultrasound is done using a wand inserted into the rectum. Thus, it is called Transrectal Ultrasound, or TRUS. The wand transmits soundwaves through the rectal wall toward the prostate gland. The waves bounce off of different kinds of tissue, and register as black-and-white images on a computer monitor. Although abnormal prostate tissue may show up differently than normal tissue, the information about the true nature of the abnormality is limited.
Traditionally, prostate needle biopsies have been performed by urologists under ultrasound guidance.
- TRUS clearly reveals the size and shape of the prostate
- Urologists can use ultrasound equipment in the office setting, much like gynecologists do for uterine scans
- TRUS can guide a systematic needle biopsy that samples areas on both sides of the gland, usually a total of 10-14 needles (5-7 per side)
- TRUS is relatively inexpensive
- TRUS does not detect all abnormalities or give information about the true nature of suspicious areas.
- TRUS is considered “blind” and randomized because without any other enhanced features, it cannot truly target tumors.
- The greater the number of needles, the greater the risk of infection and trauma to the rectal wall.
- TRUS misses 30% of cancers or more, resulting in false negative diagnoses.
- The hidden costs of misdiagnosis, overtreatment, and post-treatment side effects have not been adequately studied.
- Because of its random nature, TRUS may pick up small, insignificant cancer that does not actually require treatment.
ultiparametric 3T MRI
Experts agree that MRI is the most sensitive imaging technique of all currently available imaging technologies. Today’s features include a number of parameters that reveal much more than just prostate anatomy, revealing clearer visual definition of even small prostate cancer tumors or other abnormalities. For example:
- Diseased (pathologic) tissue shows up as anatomical differences (T2 weighted imaging)
- The movement of water molecules in tumor cells differentiates them from normal cells (diffusion weighted imaging or DWI)
- The presence of certain chemicals (metabolites) in tumor cells distinguishes them from healthy cells (spectroscopy or MRI-S)
- Changes in the uptake and washout of contrast agents characterizes cancer cells (dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging or DCE)
In addition to these multipara metric indicators of a cancer, our powerful 3T (3 Tesla) magnet provides very high resolution of tumors.
According to an authoritative Dutch center, “Multiparametric (mp)-MRI has been shown to be highly accurate in detecting and localizing intermediately aggressive and highly aggressive cancers.” However, they emphasize that the experience of the radiologist conducting prostate MRI is critical in capturing the images and correctly interpreting them.
Studies designed to correlate tumors identified by (mp)-MRI in pre-prostatectomy patients confirms the accuracy of the MRI images when read by an experience radiologist, as compared to surgically removed prostate specimens.
iopsy at Alaska Urology
A biopsy done under real time MRI guidance in the bore (tunnel) of the magnet, especially by an expert, is the most precise and efficient biopsy available.
- Imaging is done in real time
- Very high resolution of suspected area allows pinpoint identification
- Minimal needles, minimal trauma to rectal wall, and greatly reduced risk of infection
- Clear verification of location, needle trajectory and placement
- Tissue captured from the center of a tumor offers the most accurate identification of aggression in the laboratory
- Precise diagnosis fosters more effective, customized treatment plans
- Not widely available in U.S.
Alaska Urology offers patients the safest, most efficient and accurate biopsy process available. Guided by real time 3T multipara metric images, under the direction of the radiologist with most U.S. experience in MRI-guided biopsies, the results offer a significant degree of confidence over other biopsy methods. It is our belief that the MRI Ultrasound Fusion Guided Biopsy is a positive addition to the field of urology, helping urologists brings targeted biopsies into their practice. However, we also believe that MRI imaging done live, in real time, has no substitute. There is no need for a “middle man” like the fusion process, with the extra steps (and therefore room for some distortion). Live MRI imaging, read and interpreted by recognized prostate MRI experts at Alaska Urology, is quickly becoming the preferred prostate biopsy guidance that can best inform decisions for tailored prostate cancer treatment.